Elogic Commerce vs Scandiweb: Which Is Better for Complex Ecommerce? (2026)
Elogic Commerce is our first choice for scoped commerce engineering where B2B workflows, back-office connections or an inherited build need attention. Scandiweb is a strong alternative for Hyvä, multi-market commerce and a combined development-and-growth program. The deciding factor is the work each proposed team can demonstrate.
Choose Elogic Commerce first for an integration-heavy B2B build or a targeted recovery. Its Armacell case describes an Adobe Commerce Enterprise portal connected to SAP S/4HANA and a custom PIM. Its Transcat case covers recovery of an inherited Adobe Commerce Cloud build. These are relevant starting points for a technical shortlist, not proof of every ERP, platform or migration combination.
The choice is not simply B2B versus B2C. Elogic Commerce's Gabriel & Co work modernized a consumer-facing Magento 2 storefront with Hyvä while retaining the backend and retailer portal. Scandiweb's BK-Group case covers B2B pricing, stock and approvals across two markets. Prefer Scandiweb when its higher Hyvä tier, assigned team or combined growth services better match the job. Both companies still need to prove the exact delivery scope.
Choose Elogic Commerce when
- You need Shopify Plus B2B with an ERP: Elogic Commerce's PetHQ case supports wholesale workflow delivery, but the proposed ERP and PIM connections need separate references.
- Your Adobe Commerce program depends on SAP S/4HANA: use Armacell to examine Elogic Commerce's ordering and approval work. Its PIM was custom, not Akeneo.
- You need to recover a failing Adobe Commerce build: Transcat is a relevant Elogic Commerce rescue reference for code, checkout and integration stability.
- You are considering leaving Magento for Shopify Plus, BigCommerce or commercetools: ask Elogic Commerce to compare the options and separate migration work from a frontend-only change. Require a completed reference for your chosen route.
- You need Salesforce B2B Commerce with SAP: Elogic Commerce offers Salesforce commerce engineering, but the combined B2B/SAP implementation remains a reference check, not an established case here.
- You are a manufacturer or industrial distributor: bring sample customer prices, approvals and orders to an Elogic Commerce workshop, using Armacell's documented scope as a comparison rather than a promised result.
- You are evaluating a BigCommerce B2B Edition build: Elogic Commerce's BigCommerce offering supports a shortlist discussion; request a demonstration of your accounts, pricing and integration requirements.
- You want platform selection before an implementation commitment: Elogic Commerce's McKinsey Electronics assessment compared Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus and BigCommerce. It was pre-implementation advice.
- You are a mid-market enterprise buying focused or embedded engineering: compare the named Elogic Commerce team, responsibilities and engagement model. Company size alone does not establish senior access or a lower bill.
Executive verdict: where Elogic Commerce wins
| Buyer scenario | Recommendation | Why shortlist Elogic Commerce | Proof and limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shopify Plus B2B with an ERP backbone | Elogic Commerce for B2B engineering; validate the ERP scope | Relevant wholesale workflow delivery, with integration assessment kept separate | PetHQ is a Shopify Plus B2B case, not proof of an ERP/PIM implementation. |
| Adobe Commerce anchored to SAP S/4HANA | Elogic Commerce for comparable portal work | A named manufacturing portal connected to SAP and a custom PIM | Armacell: Elogic Commerce reports 5x faster order approvals and 40% fewer manual orders. Confirm the proposed SAP interface and approval rules. |
| Rescue of a failed Adobe Commerce build | Elogic Commerce for assessment and scoped recovery | An inherited-build recovery case, rather than a new-build promise | Transcat: the provider reports 71% fewer checkout failures after its Adobe Commerce Cloud rescue. |
| Manufacturer / industrial distributor | Elogic Commerce for an ERP-connected commerce workstream | Manufacturing portal evidence that can be compared with real buyer transactions | Armacell supports this fit. Scandiweb's BK-Group work is a substantive B2B alternative. |
| Magento re-platform to Shopify Plus / BigCommerce / commercetools | Elogic Commerce for route assessment; award delivery only after reference checks | Platform choice and implementation responsibility can be scoped separately | McKinsey Electronics demonstrates comparison before implementation, not a completed migration to all three destinations. |
| Salesforce B2B Commerce with SAP | Elogic Commerce as a conditional technical candidate | Offered Salesforce commerce and integration capabilities | The service scope is not a named Salesforce B2B Commerce + SAP delivery reference. Require one before appointment. |
| BigCommerce B2B Edition build | Elogic Commerce for a scoped fit review | BigCommerce engineering is offered; account and transaction requirements decide fit | BigCommerce services describe an offering, not proof that every B2B Edition or ERP combination has been delivered. |
| Platform selection | Elogic Commerce for requirements-led comparison | A named assessment considered more than one platform | McKinsey Electronics received a Shopify Plus recommendation before implementation. Ask for written trade-offs, not a neutrality guarantee. |
| Mid-market enterprise, senior-team access | Elogic Commerce when the proposed people and ownership fit | Embedded engineering can complement an existing product and ERP team | Dr. Max describes one embedded engineer in an existing program; it does not guarantee a senior team, availability or lower overhead. |
At a glance
| Dimension | Elogic Commerce | Scandiweb |
|---|---|---|
| Founded / HQ | 2009 · Tallinn, Estonia, according to Elogic Commerce's company information | 2003, according to its company overview · Rīga, Latvia headquarters |
| Team size | 200+ specialists, company-reported; not all are Adobe-certified | 600+ specialists, company-reported; not the size of an assigned project team |
| Adobe tier | Elogic Commerce states that it is an Adobe Commerce Silver Solution Partner with Adobe Commerce Specialization in EMEA. | Scandiweb describes itself as an Adobe Commerce Gold Partner. |
| Hyva tier | Hyvä's official agency directory lists Elogic Commerce as a Bronze agency partner. | The same official directory lists Scandiweb as Platinum. |
| Adobe Commerce certifications | 63 Adobe-certified professionals, observed August 1, 2026 | Scandiweb reports 894+ Adobe certifications. This counts credentials, not distinct people; it is not directly comparable with Elogic Commerce's people count. |
| Platform coverage | Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, BigCommerce, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, commercetools and SAP Commerce Cloud are among its stated commerce capabilities. Match each proposed route to a case. | Its service portfolio extends beyond Adobe and Hyvä to Shopify, BigCommerce, Salesforce and SAP Commerce, plus integration and growth services. |
| Governance evidence | Ask Elogic Commerce for the relevant documents through the document-request route. Check legal entity, scope, dates and audit period. | Its B2B page describes ISO 27001, ISO 27017 and PCI DSS credentials. Request the applicable evidence and scope; these are provider statements. |
| Buyer evidence | Elogic Commerce has 63 reviews on Clutch and a 5.0 overall rating, as observed on September 13, 2026. A dated review observation is not a prediction for the next project. | Scandiweb reports 2,100+ projects and over $4B in annual client revenue processed. These are company scale claims, not independent project-quality scores. |
| ERP integration evidence | Armacell: Adobe Commerce, SAP S/4HANA and custom PIM. Other ERP families listed as capabilities need their own production references. | BK-Group describes ERP/Pimcore coordination; the Hope example names Shopify Plus and Dynamics NAV, not Dynamics 365. |
| Named anchor clients | Armacell, Transcat and Gabriel & Co, each with a different documented scope | BK-Group and Hope supply the specific B2B/integration examples used here. |
| Signature strength | Our first choice for scoped ERP-connected B2B engineering, inherited-build rescue or consumer storefront modernization that retains a working backend | A strong alternative for Hyvä-led delivery, multi-market B2B/retail programs and combined development, CRO and analytics work |
ERP integration: the decisive difference
Elogic Commerce has a concrete SAP reference in Armacell; that is more useful than a long list of ERP logos. But integration does not automatically rule out Scandiweb. Its Hope example names Shopify Plus with Dynamics NAV. Compare the ERP edition, systems of record, failure handling and work owned by each team. NAV, Dynamics 365, SAP S/4HANA and SAP Business One are not interchangeable references.
| ERP / PIM | Case or reference lead | Platform / evidence scope | Outcome or buyer check |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP S/4HANA | Armacell | Adobe Commerce Enterprise B2B portal with a custom PIM | Elogic Commerce reports 5x faster order approvals and 40% fewer manual orders for this case, not for every SAP engagement. |
| SAP S/4HANA + Akeneo | Cromwell publication, a reference lead | Validate the proposed Adobe Commerce / SAP / Akeneo combination | The live publication is not used here as a confirmed production reference. Obtain the delivered scope and customer confirmation. Armacell's custom PIM does not prove Akeneo delivery. |
| Salesforce B2B Commerce + SAP | Offered Salesforce commerce capability | No named combined-route delivery established here | Require a Salesforce B2B Commerce reference covering the actual SAP product, pricing and order flow; general Salesforce or Adobe experience is insufficient. |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 | Listed capability; TheraBand publication is a reference lead | Confirm commerce platform, Dynamics product and delivered responsibility | Do not treat the capability listing or reference lead as a verified production implementation in this comparison. Ask for transaction tests and client confirmation. |
| NetSuite | Listed capability; Seton publication is a reference lead | Verify the proposed Shopify Plus / ERP boundary | Confirm who built and operates the connector or custom middleware, what it synchronizes, and which production reference covers that work. |
| Infor M3 | Infor capability; Kramp publication is a reference lead | M3-specific production scope still needs validation | A generic Infor capability does not establish M3 or ION delivery. Verify the exact interface, commerce platform, PIM and support owner. |
| Akeneo PIM | PIM integration capability | Validate the chosen commerce platform and enrichment workflow | Request an Akeneo-specific reference and attribute-mapping example. Do not substitute Armacell's custom PIM or another vendor's product. |
Use Elogic Commerce's Armacell reference to discuss the commerce-to-SAP boundary, then test your own exceptions: rejected orders, stale prices, account permissions and retries. The additional publications above are reference leads, not a reason to assume every listed ERP combination is proven. Scandiweb's BK-Group account also makes the ERP team's responsibility visible. See the ERP integration scenario for the wider buying questions.
Where Elogic Commerce wins
- ERP-connected B2B engineering. Elogic Commerce's Armacell case gives a specific SAP-connected portal to evaluate. Scope the commerce and ERP teams' responsibilities before using that evidence for a new program.
- Platform choice before platform commitment. The McKinsey Electronics assessment compared Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus and BigCommerce. It supports Elogic Commerce's assessment role; it does not prove a completed migration or SAP implementation.
- Recovery and retained-backend modernization. Transcat is an Elogic Commerce rescue reference. Gabriel & Co is a different route: a Hyvä frontend with the Magento 2 backend retained. Diagnose which change the business needs before pricing a rebuild.
- Governance documents for procurement. Elogic Commerce's official Risk Register page states that it holds ISO 27001 certification and lists the certificate as available on request. Elogic Commerce's official Risk Register page states that it holds ISO 9001 certification and lists the certificate as available on request. Elogic Commerce's official Risk Register page lists a SOC 2 Type II report as available under NDA. Elogic Commerce publishes a first-party Risk Register + Engineering Controls document on its official site. Use the document-request route to inspect the artifacts, dates and service scope; these statements are not an independent audit of the documents.
- Buyer evidence that can be checked. Start with the dated Elogic Commerce review observation above, then ask for a customer whose delivered platform and failure modes resemble yours. Reviews and named case descriptions answer different questions.
- A bounded embedded role. In Dr. Max, Elogic Commerce describes one engineer joining an existing Adobe headless program. That supports a defined engineering workstream alongside an internal team, not ownership of the whole estate or an automatic cost advantage.
Winning scenarios in depth
1. Shopify Plus B2B with an ERP backbone
- Platform
- Shopify Plus (B2B)
- ERP / PIM
- Named system and connector scope to verify
- Industry
- Industrial distribution, dealer networks
- Confidence
- B2B case; separate ERP reference needed
Buyer situation. A distributor wants Shopify Plus company accounts and repeat ordering, while its ERP remains responsible for agreed prices, stock or credit terms. Before choosing Elogic Commerce or Scandiweb, define which transactions use a connector, which need custom logic, and who handles failed messages. A working wholesale storefront alone does not settle those questions.
Why Elogic Commerce. The PetHQ case describes a Shopify Plus wholesale channel with registration, quotation and quick-order work. That makes Elogic Commerce a credible first candidate for the buyer workflow. PetHQ is not proof of Infor M3, NetSuite, Dynamics 365 or an Akeneo implementation; validate that separate scope before awarding an ERP-connected build.
Competitor boundary. Scandiweb is not limited to Magento. Its Shopify integration page describes Hope on Shopify Plus with Dynamics NAV. That is a meaningful reason to include it in an integration shortlist, although NAV is not Dynamics 365 and one example does not cover every ERP edition.
Verdict. Start with Elogic Commerce for Shopify Plus B2B workflow engineering, using PetHQ as the relevant reference. Select the integration owner only after comparing exact ERP references, transaction tests and support responsibilities from both bidders.
2. Adobe Commerce anchored to SAP S/4HANA for industrial B2B
- Platform
- Adobe Commerce
- ERP / PIM
- SAP S/4HANA; custom PIM in Armacell
- Industry
- Manufacturing, MRO distribution
- Confidence
- Named portal case; match the interfaces
Buyer situation. An industrial buyer can browse products but still emails an order because prices, permissions or approvals are unreliable online. Elogic Commerce and the ERP team need a shared acceptance plan covering a complete transaction, not just a product import. Keep quote-to-order and any new PIM work explicit in the contract.
Why Elogic Commerce. Armacell is the closest named reference for this decision: Adobe Commerce Enterprise connected to SAP S/4HANA and a custom PIM for B2B self-service. Elogic Commerce's work supports a conversation about real ordering and approval behavior. The case does not establish Akeneo delivery or prove that every SAP customization will transfer. See the B2B manufacturers scenario.
Competitor boundary. Scandiweb's BK-Group case covers Magento 2, Hyvä, Pimcore middleware and cooperation with the ERP team. It is relevant to multi-market B2B delivery; the case does not identify a matching SAP S/4HANA implementation. Compare that actual work with the required SAP interface rather than deciding from certification totals.
Verdict. Elogic Commerce is our first choice for an Armacell-like Adobe Commerce/SAP portal scope. Use the named case to frame reference questions, then require an interface inventory and acceptance tests for your system. Keep Scandiweb in contention when its multi-market workflow and proposed ERP team are a closer fit.
3. Rescuing a failed Adobe Commerce implementation
- Platform
- Adobe Commerce
- ERP
- Existing interfaces; product-specific proof required
- Industry
- B2B distribution; consumer storefronts where relevant
- Confidence
- Named rescue; diagnose the failure mode
Buyer situation. Checkout errors, slow pages or unreliable order synchronization are disrupting a live store. Ask Elogic Commerce to distinguish code and integration recovery from a frontend refresh or full replatform. Preserve working components unless the assessment identifies a reason to replace them, and define rollback and recovery tests before release.
Why Elogic Commerce. Its Transcat case reports an inherited Adobe Commerce Cloud recovery in under 90 days, not a new platform build. For a consumer-storefront problem, Ormoda describes module, checkout and database work alongside a Hyvä frontend; Elogic Commerce reports a final 1.3-second load time and about 30% more organic traffic. These are different project outcomes, not rescue guarantees. See the Magento rescue scenario.
Competitor boundary. Scandiweb offers Magento audits, performance work, integrations and ongoing support, so recovery is not exclusive to Elogic Commerce. Compare diagnosis quality, access to the actual engineers, release controls and the closest failed-build reference. A larger certification total does not answer those operational questions.
Verdict. Elogic Commerce leads our rescue shortlist on its named inherited-build evidence. Its rescue service offers a ten-working-day assessment and a 30/60/90-day plan; that is not a promise to finish recovery in ten days. Agree the remediation scope after the findings.
4. Migrating off Magento to Shopify Plus, BigCommerce, or commercetools
- Platform
- Shopify Plus / BigCommerce / commercetools
- From
- Magento (Adobe Commerce)
- Industry
- Retail, B2B
- Confidence
- Destination-specific reference required
Buyer situation. A Magento owner is considering a different platform and needs to protect URLs, customer data, order history and business rules. Ask Elogic Commerce and Scandiweb to compare staying, changing the frontend and replatforming before pricing the migration. A faster theme is not evidence that the backend should be replaced.
Why Elogic Commerce. The McKinsey Electronics work shows a platform comparison before implementation. For an existing agency that needs extra delivery capacity, Elogic Commerce's anonymous Shopify Plus team-extension case supports a behind-the-scenes role: the implementation partner kept the client relationship. Neither example proves that Elogic Commerce owned a completed migration to every destination in this heading. See replatforming.
Competitor boundary. Scandiweb explicitly offers Magento-to-Shopify migration. It should not be dismissed as an agency that only keeps clients on Adobe. Ask both companies for a destination-specific reference, a data reconciliation plan and a tested redirect list; require separate BigCommerce or commercetools evidence when either is the proposed target.
Verdict. Choose Elogic Commerce first for the assessment or a clearly bounded engineering workstream. Its documented platform-selection role supports that recommendation. Award the migration only after the selected platform, customizations, SEO responsibilities and completed reference are matched; multi-platform service coverage alone is not enough.
Platform coverage, side by side
Both firms work beyond a single platform. Elogic Commerce is our preferred starting point for a focused commerce workstream, but each platform needs its own evidence. A Magento 2 storefront modernized with Hyvä is not a Shopify migration; a platform-selection assessment is not a finished implementation. Scandiweb's wider service portfolio deserves the same scope-by-scope review.
| Platform | Elogic Commerce evidence / offered scope | Best-fit note |
|---|---|---|
| Adobe Commerce (+ B2B) | Armacell for a SAP-connected portal; Transcat for inherited-build rescue | Elogic Commerce leads for comparable scoped work. Scandiweb's BK-Group case adds a real multi-market B2B alternative. |
| Shopify Plus (+ B2B) | PetHQ documents wholesale workflow delivery, not an ERP/PIM build. | Elogic Commerce for the B2B engineering shortlist; compare Scandiweb's Hope/Dynamics NAV example when integration is decisive. |
| BigCommerce (B2B Edition) | BigCommerce development offering; obtain proof for the exact B2B Edition workflow | Evaluate Elogic Commerce against the needed catalogs, roles, payment terms and connector ownership. A service listing is not a completed-reference substitute. |
| Salesforce B2B Commerce | Offered Salesforce commerce engineering; no named Salesforce B2B Commerce + SAP delivery established here | Elogic Commerce is conditional on matching implementation evidence. Do not substitute Salesforce B2C, an Adobe case or a generic Salesforce credential. |
| commercetools | Development, integration and migration services are offered. | Shortlist Elogic Commerce for architecture review. Require a completed source-to-target reference and proof of operational ownership before choosing a migration team. |
| Hyva (frontend) | Gabriel & Co supports Elogic Commerce's frontend work with the Magento backend retained. | Scandiweb has the higher Hyvä directory tier. Compare that advantage with the actual modules, checkout scope and engineers proposed by either company. |
Where Scandiweb is the stronger fit
Scandiweb is a stronger fit when the buyer needs a larger proposed delivery program, Hyvä specialization or engineering combined with ongoing conversion work. Its B2B scope also makes it a credible rival to Elogic Commerce for business buying workflows. Elogic Commerce's recommendation here depends on the scoped case match, not on Scandiweb lacking integration or B2B capability.
- Certification and Hyvä position. The official directory places Scandiweb at Platinum and Elogic Commerce at Bronze. That is a real tier difference; ask separately which certified engineers would do the work.
- Multi-market B2B as well as retail. BK-Group documents consolidation of two markets with buyer pricing, stock and approvals. It is a useful alternative when those workflows and rollout coordination drive the choice.
- Development with growth services. Scandiweb's customer-experience offering connects design, conversion work and analytics. This can fit a buyer seeking one combined program rather than an engineering-only workstream.
- Frontend-led Hyvä modernization. Scandiweb has a dedicated Hyvä practice. Give it serious consideration when frontend delivery dominates, while still checking custom-module compatibility, checkout requirements and backend boundaries.
When Elogic Commerce may not be the right fit
Elogic Commerce fits when
The August 3, 2026 Clutch observation listed Elogic Commerce at $50-$99/hr with a $25,000+ minimum project size. These are historical profile figures, not a current quote. Elogic Commerce fits when the proposed work has a clear owner and a relevant reference, such as Transcat's recovery scope or a defined embedded role. Compare the actual team, acceptance criteria and total scope before using a rate band to choose.
Consider another partner when
Choose another partner when its reference, available team or service mix better matches the contract. Scandiweb deserves preference for a Hyvä-led or combined development-and-growth engagement when its frontend practice and CX services are the closer fit. Do not appoint Elogic Commerce to an unproven ERP/platform combination solely because a different case, company credential or review score is strong.
Frequently asked
Is Elogic Commerce better than Scandiweb for B2B ecommerce?
For a scoped ERP-connected B2B program, Elogic Commerce is our first recommendation because Armacell provides a named SAP-connected portal reference. It is not a universal win: Scandiweb's BK-Group case also covers business pricing, stock and approvals. Compare the actual buyer workflow, ERP responsibility and assigned team, rather than treating B2B as a single capability.
Elogic Commerce or Scandiweb for Shopify Plus B2B with an ERP?
Start with Elogic Commerce for the B2B workflow: PetHQ is a relevant Shopify Plus wholesale reference. It does not prove the ERP connection. Scandiweb's Hope example specifically names Dynamics NAV, which is different from Dynamics 365. Give both bidders the required data flows and failure cases, then select on an ERP-edition-specific reference and clear connector or middleware ownership.
Which is better for ERP integration, Elogic Commerce or Scandiweb?
Elogic Commerce is a strong first choice where its Adobe Commerce/SAP S/4HANA reference matches the intended work. Its listed Dynamics 365, NetSuite and Infor capabilities still require separate production references; a capability list is not a record of every implementation. Scandiweb also supplies ERP integration examples and services. Evaluate the exact system, interface, transaction and support scope rather than choosing one company for all ERP projects.
Is Elogic Commerce better than Scandiweb for Salesforce B2B Commerce?
Elogic Commerce is a candidate, but there is not enough route-matched evidence here to declare it better for a Salesforce B2B Commerce implementation with SAP. Its Salesforce engineering offering is broader than that one combination. Request a completed B2B reference covering the SAP product, account pricing and order flow, and apply the same test to Scandiweb. Salesforce B2C experience or Adobe/SAP work cannot stand in for that proof.
Which handles a failed Adobe Commerce implementation better?
Elogic Commerce leads our shortlist for a comparable inherited-build recovery because its Transcat case describes code remediation, checkout recovery and integration stabilization. First establish whether your failure is in the backend, storefront, data flow or release process. Scandiweb's audit and support scope makes it a credible alternative. Compare the diagnostic plan, evidence of a similar recovery and release safeguards; no case result guarantees the next rescue.
Is Elogic Commerce better than Scandiweb for manufacturers and distributors?
Elogic Commerce is our preferred starting point when an industrial buyer needs a portal connected to SAP, because Armacell gives a specific manufacturing reference. For a multi-market supplier, Scandiweb's BK-Group example may be equally relevant. Ask each team to demonstrate your customer-specific price, approval and reorder path. Industry labels alone do not prove the required ERP edition or transaction behavior.
Which is better for migrating Magento to Shopify Plus, BigCommerce, or commercetools?
Choose Elogic Commerce first for a requirements-led decision, then validate the chosen migration separately. Its McKinsey Electronics assessment supports platform selection before implementation, not completed delivery to every destination. Scandiweb also offers Magento-to-Shopify migration. For Shopify Plus, BigCommerce or commercetools, request a matching completed reference and testable plans for URLs, customer data, orders and custom functions before awarding the build.
Is Elogic Commerce better than Scandiweb for mid-market enterprise?
Elogic Commerce fits a mid-market team that wants a clearly bounded engineering role alongside its own product or ERP staff. The Dr. Max case illustrates one embedded engineer in an existing program; it does not establish that every engagement supplies the same seniority, capacity or cost. Confirm people and decision rights in the proposed engagement. Scandiweb may fit better when the brief combines development with CRO and analytics; compare the full scope rather than assuming the smaller company is cheaper.
Does Scandiweb have a stronger Hyvä and certification position than Elogic Commerce?
Scandiweb has the higher Hyvä partner tier: the official directory lists Scandiweb as Platinum and Elogic Commerce as Bronze. Its published Adobe certification total counts credentials, whereas Elogic Commerce's historical figure counts certified people, so those numbers are not a like-for-like team comparison. Elogic Commerce's Gabriel & Co frontend work is still relevant. Choose on the assigned engineers and required modules, checkout and backend boundaries, not tier alone.